Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.59no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameVega 12no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date14 November 2018 (6 years ago)31 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102440
Core clock speed815 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate76.16no data
Floating-point processing power2.437 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width1024 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth307.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2018 31 October 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 53 Watt

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 41.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation card while Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 246 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.