GRID RTX T10-4 vs Radeon Pro VII

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.86no data
Power efficiency9.14no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 20TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404608
Core clock speed1400 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate408.0401.8
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS12.86 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs240288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 260 Watt

Pro VII has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro VII and GRID RTX T10-4. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-4
GRID RTX T10-4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1549 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID RTX T10-4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.