Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Pro V7300X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameEllesmereCezanne
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateno data13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1188 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate179.040.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs14424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 384SP has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 189% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V7300X and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V7300X is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V7300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V7300X or Radeon Graphics 384SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.