Xbox Series X 6nm GPU vs Radeon Pro V620

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21Scarlett 6nm
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 November 2021 (3 years ago)15 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46083328
Core clock speed1825 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate633.6379.6
Floating-point processing power20.28 TFLOPS12.15 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs288208
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mm301 mm
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB10 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.21.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2021 15 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 200 Watt

Pro V620 has a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Xbox Series X 6nm GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V620 and Xbox Series X 6nm GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation graphics card while Xbox Series X 6nm GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V620
Radeon Pro V620
AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU
Xbox Series X 6nm GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate Xbox Series X 6nm GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.