A10G vs Radeon Pro V520

Place in the ranking	174	68
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.69	22.21
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 12	GA102
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 December 2020 (4 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	9216
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1320 MHz
Boost clock speed	1600 MHz	1710 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	230.4	492.5
Floating-point processing power	7.373 TFLOPS	31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	144	288
Tensor Cores	no data	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	600.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro V520 31.81

A10G 48.59
+52.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro V520 12257

A10G 18723
+52.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.81	48.59
Recency	1 December 2020	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt

Pro V520 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

A10G, on the other hand, has a 52.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 50% lower power consumption.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro V520 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.