GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Radeon Pro V320

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated74
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Power efficiencyno data27.26
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843072
Core clock speed852 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0181.4
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs22496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 4060 Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 and GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V320
Radeon Pro V320
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3243 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.