Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Duo with Quadro K2200M, including specs and performance data.

Pro Duo
2016
8 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 350 Watt
21.16
+135%

Pro Duo outperforms K2200M by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking254479
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.34no data
Power efficiency4.199.58
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameCapsaicinGM107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date26 April 2016 (8 years ago)19 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096640
Compute units128no data
Core clock speedno data667 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate256.026.68
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs25640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length277 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
Enduro+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
Shader Model6.05.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan++
Mantle+-
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Duo 21.16
+135%
K2200M 8.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Duo 8164
+135%
K2200M 3468

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.16 8.99
Recency 26 April 2016 19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 65 Watt

Pro Duo has a 135.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

K2200M, on the other hand, has 438.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo is a workstation card while Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 3621 vote

Rate Radeon Pro Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.