Radeon Pro SSG vs Pro 575

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.50
Power efficiencyno data7.77
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 20Fiji
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)26 July 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484096
Core clock speed1096 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate140.3268.8
Floating-point processing power4.489 TFLOPS8.602 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128256
L1 Cache512 KB1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 26 July 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 260 Watt

Pro 575 has an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 117% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 575 and Radeon Pro SSG. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro SSG is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 99 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 3653 votes

Rate Radeon Pro SSG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 575 or Radeon Pro SSG, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.