L4 vs Radeon Pro 5700

Place in the ranking	179	188
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	16.35	28.71
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 10	AD104
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	7424
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	795 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	72 Watt
Texture fill rate	194.4	489.6
Floating-point processing power	6.221 TFLOPS	30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	144	240
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	169 mm
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	300.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5700 30.70
+2.8%

L4 29.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5700 11844
+2.8%

L4 11518

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.70	29.86
Recency	4 August 2020	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	72 Watt

Pro 5700 has a 2.8% higher aggregate performance score.

L4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 80.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 5700 and L4.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.