Tegra 4i GPU vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.26no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 10Tegra 4
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)19 February 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1243 MHz660 MHz
Boost clock speed1499 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million11 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate239.81.320
Floating-point processing power7.675 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1602

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6ES 3.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 19 February 2013
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 20 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra 4i GPU, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Tegra 4i GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation card while Tegra 4i GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIA Tegra 4i GPU
Tegra 4i GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 41 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4i GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.