Radeon Pro W6400 vs Pro 5700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro W6400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 5700 XT
2020
16 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
32.73
+57.1%

Pro 5700 XT outperforms Pro W6400 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.2628.56
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1243 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1499 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate239.8111.9
Floating-point processing power7.675 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5700 XT 32.73
+57.1%
Pro W6400 20.83

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5700 XT 12613
+57.1%
Pro W6400 8027

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.73 20.83
Recency 4 August 2020 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 41 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.