Quadro NVS 150M vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Place in the ranking	174	1411
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	17.34	1.28
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Navi 10	G98
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)	15 August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	8
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	530 MHz
Boost clock speed	1499 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	10,300 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	239.8	2.120
Floating-point processing power	7.675 TFLOPS	0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	160	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	MXM-I
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.5	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
CUDA	-	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5700 XT 31.73
+17528%

NVS 150M 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5700 XT 12567
+17853%

NVS 150M 70

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
World of Tanks	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Valorant	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	0−1	0−1

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 29 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.73	0.18
Recency	4 August 2020	15 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	7 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	10 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has a 17527.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 150M, on the other hand, has 1200% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 150M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation card while Quadro NVS 150M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.