Radeon HD 8550M vs Pro 560

Place in the ranking	481	973
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.37	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Sun
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	13 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	320
Core clock speed	907 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	850 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	58.05	17.00
Floating-point processing power	1.858 TFLOPS	0.544 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	64	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560 9.01
+501%

HD 8550M 1.50

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560 5305
+306%

HD 8550M 1307

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro 560 18982
+412%

HD 8550M 3705

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+250%

4−5

−250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +600%	4−5 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1900%	3−4 −1900%
Hitman 3	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +233%	14−16 −233%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +600%	4−5 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +1150%	2−3 −1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +81.8%	30−35 −81.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +600%	4−5 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1900%	3−4 −1900%
Hitman 3	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +233%	14−16 −233%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +600%	4−5 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +1150%	2−3 −1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +127%	10−12 −127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +81.8%	30−35 −81.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1900%	3−4 −1900%
Hitman 3	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +233%	14−16 −233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +127%	10−12 −127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +81.8%	30−35 −81.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+1150%

2−3

−1150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +533%	6−7 −533%
Hitman 3	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +714%	7−8 −714%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+275%

4−5

−275%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +620%	5−6 −620%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+200%

3−4

−200%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 560 is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro 560 surpassed HD 8550M in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.01	1.50
Recency	18 April 2017	13 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm

Pro 560 has a 500.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8550M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 8550M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.