UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon Pro 555

Place in the ranking	513	893
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.45	13.71
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Gen. 11
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	32
Core clock speed	850 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	900 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.80	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.306 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1275 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	81.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 555 8.15
+308%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 2.00

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 555 5185
+226%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1589

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 555 3721
+266%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1016

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 555 22624
+224%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6977

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 555 217690
+202%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 72158

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Pro 555 1078
+227%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 330

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Pro 555 42
+233%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	34 +278%	9 −278%
4K	12 +500%	2−3 −500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14
+225%

4−5

−225%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20 +186%	7−8 −186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Battlefield 5	32 +3100%	1−2 −3100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	26 +767%	3−4 −767%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +360%	5−6 −360%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +575%	8−9 −575%
Hitman 3	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +176%	16−18 −176%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42 +320%	10−11 −320%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	26 +271%	7−8 −271%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Battlefield 5	26 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	21 +600%	3−4 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +360%	5−6 −360%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +575%	8−9 −575%
Hitman 3	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +176%	16−18 −176%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +200%	9 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	15 +400%	3−4 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	18 +125%	8−9 −125%
Hitman 3	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +683%	6 −683%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +108%	13 −108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +367%	3 −367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+475%

4−5

−475%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +357%	7−8 −357%
Hitman 3	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +373%	10−12 −373%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+180%

5−6

−180%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Hitman 3	4−5	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+167%

3−4

−167%

This is how Pro 555 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

Pro 555 is 278% faster in 1080p
Pro 555 is 500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 555 is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro 555 surpassed UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.15	2.00
Recency	5 June 2017	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	4 Watt

Pro 555 has a 307.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1775% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 555 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.