GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 9100
2017
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
31.96
+94.3%

PRO WX 9100 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking183342
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.7214.15
Power efficiency9.5315.04
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10GP107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 July 2017 (7 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $139

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1050 Ti has 21% better value for money than PRO WX 9100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096768
Core clock speed1200 MHz1291 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1392 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate384.066.82
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS2.138 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Ansel-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 9100 31.96
+94.3%
GTX 1050 Ti 16.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 9100 12285
+94.3%
GTX 1050 Ti 6322

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 66605
+221%
GTX 1050 Ti 20734

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 67893
+242%
GTX 1050 Ti 19852

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+86.3%
51
−86.3%
1440p60−65
+93.5%
31
−93.5%
4K45−50
+80%
25
−80%

Cost per frame, $

1080p16.83
−518%
2.73
+518%
1440p26.65
−494%
4.48
+494%
4K35.53
−539%
5.56
+539%
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 518% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 494% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 539% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55
+0%
55
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+0%
64
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+0%
50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+0%
49
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 125
+0%
125
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+0%
36
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%
Valorant 53
+0%
53
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+0%
45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+0%
29
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
+0%
28
+0%
Metro Exodus 9
+0%
9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 11
+0%
11
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+0%
13
+0%

This is how PRO WX 9100 and GTX 1050 Ti compete in popular games:

  • PRO WX 9100 is 86% faster in 1080p
  • PRO WX 9100 is 94% faster in 1440p
  • PRO WX 9100 is 80% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.96 16.45
Recency 10 July 2017 25 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 75 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has a 94.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Ti, on the other hand, has 206.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO WX 9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 207973 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.