Quadro P3200 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 3100 with Quadro P3200, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 3100
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.58

P3200 outperforms PRO WX 3100 by a whopping 246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking561244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.36no data
Power efficiency7.3021.88
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameLexaGP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121792
Core clock speed925 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1543 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01172.8
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 3100 6.58
Quadro P3200 22.74
+246%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 3100 2540
Quadro P3200 8775
+245%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

PRO WX 3100 11702
Quadro P3200 45999
+293%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

PRO WX 3100 3691
Quadro P3200 16619
+350%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

PRO WX 3100 2671
Quadro P3200 12555
+370%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

PRO WX 3100 18522
Quadro P3200 82507
+345%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 3100 7637
Quadro P3200 34242
+348%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

PRO WX 3100 176357
Quadro P3200 419543
+138%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

PRO WX 3100 820
Quadro P3200 4356
+431%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

PRO WX 3100 11
Quadro P3200 82
+676%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

PRO WX 3100 29
Quadro P3200 140
+386%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

PRO WX 3100 17
Quadro P3200 126
+665%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

PRO WX 3100 16
Quadro P3200 122
+657%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

PRO WX 3100 18
Quadro P3200 107
+495%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

PRO WX 3100 4
Quadro P3200 47
+1108%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

PRO WX 3100 6
Quadro P3200 59
+852%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

PRO WX 3100 0
Quadro P3200 11
+3400%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

PRO WX 3100 6
Quadro P3200 59
+853%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

PRO WX 3100 11
Quadro P3200 82
+676%

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

PRO WX 3100 16
Quadro P3200 122
+657%

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

PRO WX 3100 29
Quadro P3200 140
+386%

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

PRO WX 3100 17
Quadro P3200 126
+665%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

PRO WX 3100 18
Quadro P3200 107
+495%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

PRO WX 3100 4
Quadro P3200 47
+1108%

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

PRO WX 3100 0.3
Quadro P3200 10.5
+3400%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−546%
84
+546%
4K8−9
−250%
28
+250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−282%
65
+282%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−236%
45−50
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−253%
50−55
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−219%
130−140
+219%
Hitman 3 12−14
−254%
45−50
+254%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−174%
100−110
+174%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−339%
75−80
+339%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−486%
129
+486%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−90.4%
95−100
+90.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−418%
88
+418%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−236%
45−50
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−253%
50−55
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−219%
130−140
+219%
Hitman 3 12−14
−254%
45−50
+254%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−174%
100−110
+174%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−339%
75−80
+339%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−250%
75−80
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−90.4%
95−100
+90.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−135%
40
+135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−236%
45−50
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−253%
50−55
+253%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−67.4%
72
+67.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
−254%
45−50
+254%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−174%
100−110
+174%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−250%
75−80
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−557%
46
+557%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−90.4%
95−100
+90.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−238%
40−45
+238%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−519%
130−140
+519%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−236%
45−50
+236%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−617%
40−45
+617%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−214%
130−140
+214%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−245%
35−40
+245%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hitman 3 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−556%
110−120
+556%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−833%
28
+833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Far Cry 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%

This is how PRO WX 3100 and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 546% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P3200 surpassed PRO WX 3100 in all 71 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.58 22.74
Recency 12 June 2017 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

Quadro P3200, on the other hand, has a 245.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 52 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 289 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.