Quadro 5000 SDI vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking563not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.19no data
Power efficiency7.02no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameLexaGF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)23 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $7,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512352
Core clock speed925 MHz513 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt172 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0122.57
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS0.7223 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs3244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm248 mm
Width1-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2.5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s120.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 June 2017 23 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2.5 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 172 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 164.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Quadro 5000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
Quadro 5000 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 52 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.