GeForce MX330 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

Place in the ranking	564	577
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.15	no data
Power efficiency	7.02	43.10
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Lexa	GP108
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	12 June 2017 (7 years ago)	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	384
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1531 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1594 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.01	38.26
Floating-point processing power	1.248 TFLOPS	1.224 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 3100 6.66
+5.9%

GeForce MX330 6.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 3100 2565
+5.8%

GeForce MX330 2424

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

PRO WX 3100 3691

GeForce MX330 4834
+31%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

PRO WX 3100 2671

GeForce MX330 3762
+40.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

PRO WX 3100 18522

GeForce MX330 20729
+11.9%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 3100 7624

GeForce MX330 10707
+40.4%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

PRO WX 3100 176357

GeForce MX330 243721
+38.2%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

PRO WX 3100 820

GeForce MX330 1160
+41.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13 −69.2%	22 +69.2%
4K	24−27 +0%	24 +0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	15.31	no data
4K	8.29	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12
+10%

10−11

−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −11.8%	19 +11.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +27.3%	11 −27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −40%	21 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −50%	27 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +4.9%	40−45 −4.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 −23.1%	16 +23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −203%	118 +203%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −50%	27 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −44.4%	26 +44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −53.8%	80 +53.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −29.4%	22 +29.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +0%	8 +0%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +40%	10 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −20%	18 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −5.6%	19 +5.6%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +4.9%	40−45 −4.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 −15.4%	15 +15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −172%	106 +172%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −16.7%	21 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −11.1%	20 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −44.2%	75 +44.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +143%	7 −143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +250%	4 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +25%	12 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +169%	16 −169%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	13 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +144%	16 −144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7 −71.4%	12 +71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +2%	50−55 −2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+100%

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%
Hitman 3	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +5%	40−45 −5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

+0%

10−12

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

This is how PRO WX 3100 and GeForce MX330 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX330 is 69% faster in 1080p
A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the PRO WX 3100 is 250% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX330 is 203% faster.

All in all, in popular games: