GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
VS
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.17

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 420% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking657233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.38no data
Power efficiency9.4628.66
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameLexaGN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122560
Core clock speed925 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1492 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate39.01no data
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−492%
71
+492%
1440p6−7
−467%
34
+467%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.42no data
1440p24.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−616%
130−140
+616%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−800%
81
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−422%
90−95
+422%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−616%
130−140
+616%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−611%
64
+611%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−592%
83
+592%
Fortnite 24−27
−350%
110−120
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−348%
90−95
+348%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−411%
90−95
+411%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−422%
90−95
+422%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−616%
130−140
+616%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−222%
250−260
+222%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−411%
46
+411%
Dota 2 35−40
−210%
120−130
+210%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−533%
76
+533%
Fortnite 24−27
−350%
110−120
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−348%
90−95
+348%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−507%
91
+507%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−411%
90−95
+411%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−600%
91
+600%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−422%
90−95
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−333%
39
+333%
Dota 2 35−40
−210%
120−130
+210%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−492%
71
+492%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−348%
90−95
+348%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−411%
90−95
+411%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−285%
50
+285%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−350%
110−120
+350%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−391%
160−170
+391%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−700%
40
+700%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−427%
170−180
+427%
Valorant 45−50
−312%
200−210
+312%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2100%
65−70
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−550%
52
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−455%
60−65
+455%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−429%
37
+429%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−522%
55−60
+522%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−175%
40−45
+175%
Valorant 21−24
−496%
130−140
+496%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 14−16
−420%
75−80
+420%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 492% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 467% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 3500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 60 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.17 21.67
Recency 4 June 2017 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 60 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has 71.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 419.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6900 XT
vs
Pro 575 Pro 575
GTX 670M GeForce GTX 670M
vs
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
HD 6570 Radeon HD 6570
vs
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
RX 5300 Radeon RX 5300
vs
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
A16 PCIe A16 PCIe
vs
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
GRID RTX T10-16 GRID RTX T10-16
vs
P104-100 P104 100
GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-4
vs
P104-100 P104 100
CMP 170HX CMP 170HX
vs
P104-100 P104 100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 762 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.