Radeon Pro W5700 vs PRO W7600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon Pro W5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO W7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
36.96

Pro W5700 outperforms PRO W7600 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking130120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.1144.38
Power efficiency19.4912.85
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 33Navi 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)19 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7600 has 60% better value for money than Pro W5700.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482304
Core clock speedno data1243 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHz1930 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt205 Watt
Texture fill rate312.3277.9
Floating-point processing powerno data8.893 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.15x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7600 36.96
Pro W5700 38.42
+4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7600 14240
Pro W5700 14804
+4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.96 38.42
Recency 3 August 2023 19 November 2019
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 205 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 57.7% lower power consumption.

Pro W5700, on the other hand, has a 4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon Pro W5700.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 95 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.