Radeon Pro V520 vs PRO W7600

Place in the ranking	128	172
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	70.09	no data
Power efficiency	19.78	9.85
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Navi 33	Navi 12
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)	1 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2304
Core clock speed	no data	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	2440 MHz	1600 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	312.3	230.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	128	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	241 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	18 GB/s	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort 2.1

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7600 36.88
+16.1%

Pro V520 31.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7600 14226
+16.1%

Pro V520 12257

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.88	31.77
Recency	3 August 2023	1 December 2020
Chip lithography	6 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	225 Watt

PRO W7600 has a 16.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 73.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro V520 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.