Radeon RX 570 vs PRO W7500

Place in the ranking	121	301
Place by popularity	not in top-100	18
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	16.40
Power efficiency	37.28	10.50
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Navi 33	Polaris 20
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$429	$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 510% better value for money than RX 570.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2048
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1168 MHz
Boost clock speed	1700 MHz	1244 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	190.4	159.2
Floating-point processing power	12.19 TFLOPS	5.095 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	112	128
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	216 mm	241 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1344 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.7	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7500 37.42
+107%

RX 570 18.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 14437
+107%

RX 570 6967

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	170−180 +105%	83 −105%
1440p	100−110 +104%	49 −104%
4K	55−60 +96.4%	28 −96.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.52	2.04
1440p	4.29	3.45
4K	7.80	6.04

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +0%	62 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	106 +0%	106 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68 +0%	68 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	80 +0%	80 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	85 +0%	85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	257 +0%	257 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	101 +0%	101 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120 +0%	120 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	94 +0%	94 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	98 +0%	98 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	63 +0%	63 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	69 +0%	69 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	61 +0%	61 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	255 +0%	255 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	82 +0%	82 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33 +0%	33 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45 +0%	45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	46 +0%	46 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75 +0%	75 +0%
Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +0%	43 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	61 +0%	61 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +0%	41 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29 +0%	29 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	36 +0%	36 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Far Cry 5	30 +0%	30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	149 +0%	149 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	48 +0%	48 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

+0%

30−33

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30 +0%	30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	21 +0%	21 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	29 +0%	29 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +0%	28 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 +0%	17 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 +0%	20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	15 +0%	15 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	39 +0%	39 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+0%

16−18

+0%

This is how PRO W7500 and RX 570 compete in popular games:

PRO W7500 is 105% faster in 1080p
PRO W7500 is 104% faster in 1440p
PRO W7500 is 96% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	37.42	18.06
Recency	3 August 2023	18 April 2017
Chip lithography	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	120 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 107.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 570 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.