Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Radeon PRO W7500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency37.26no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 33Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speed1500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate190.426.40
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs6412
TMUs11224
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1344 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 15 Watt

PRO W7500 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G4, on the other hand, has 366.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7500 and Iris Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G4 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Iris Xe Graphics G4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 209 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.