B200 SXM 192 GB vs Radeon PRO W6500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Blackwell (2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24GB100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416896
Core clock speed1512 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1837 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million208,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate130.6969.9
Floating-point processing power4.178 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs64528
Tensor Coresno data528
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s4.1 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 1000 Watt

PRO W6500M has 3900% lower power consumption.

B200 SXM 192 GB, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W6500M and B200 SXM 192 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W6500M is a mobile workstation card while B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W6500M
Radeon PRO W6500M
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W6500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 27 votes

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.