RTX A4500 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO W6300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking361not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.20no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24GA104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685888
Core clock speed1512 MHz510 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate97.92223.6
Floating-point processing power3.133 TFLOPS14.31 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs48184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Cores1246

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 80 Watt

PRO W6300 has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W6300 and RTX A4500 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation card while RTX A4500 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
RTX A4500 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4500 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.