Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs Radeon Instinct MI200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCDNA 2.0 (2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAldebaranGA10B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateDecember 2021 (2 years ago)March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores66561024
Core clock speed1000 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors58,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate707.220.00
Floating-point processing power22.63 TFLOPS1.28 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUs41632
Tensor Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthOAM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eLPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,638 GB/s68.29 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

Instinct MI200 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI200 and Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation card while Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.