GeForce RTX 5060 vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1552275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.50
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRS200GB206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)March 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24608
Core clock speed183 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data170 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37362.9
Floating-point processing powerno data23.22 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs2144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M 2
RTX 5060 8125
+406150%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Valorant 24−27
−508%
140−150
+508%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−2825%
230−240
+2825%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%
Valorant 24−27
−508%
140−150
+508%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%
Valorant 24−27
−508%
140−150
+508%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 50−55

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−140%
35−40
+140%
Valorant 1−2
−11200%
110−120
+11200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5060 is 11200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is ahead in 19 tests (35%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (65%)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

RTX 5060 has a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce RTX 5060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 454 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.