GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh vs ATI Radeon IGP 340

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRS200TU106B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed183 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors30 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rate0.37162.0
Floating-point processing powerno data5.184 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs2144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data352.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 16 June 2020
Chip lithography 180 nm 12 nm

RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340 and GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340
Radeon IGP 340
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 8 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.