Radeon RX 5500M vs HD 8970M Crossfire

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and Radeon RX 5500M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8970M Crossfire
2012
200 Watt
18.18
+27.4%

HD 8970M Crossfire outperforms RX 5500M by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking303363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.4211.86
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNeptune CFNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601408
Core clock speed850 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data144.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.632 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8970M Crossfire 18.18
+27.4%
RX 5500M 14.27

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8970M Crossfire 12424
RX 5500M 16476
+32.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8970M Crossfire 10354
RX 5500M 12276
+18.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8970M Crossfire 70114
+37.6%
RX 5500M 50946

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8970M Crossfire 269832
+27.9%
RX 5500M 210925

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD67
+15.5%
58
−15.5%
1440p80−85
+27%
63
−27%
4K35−40
+16.7%
30
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−30.3%
43
+30.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−48.6%
55
+48.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+25%
45−50
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−9.1%
36
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−8.1%
40
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−29.5%
101
+29.5%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−29.5%
57
+29.5%
Valorant 75−80
−44%
108
+44%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+25%
45−50
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+10%
30
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+19.4%
31
−19.4%
Dota 2 65−70
−33.3%
88
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+80%
35
−80%
Fortnite 100−105
+22%
80−85
−22%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−5.1%
82
+5.1%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
−19.7%
79
+19.7%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+219%
16
−219%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+45.5%
88
−45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+37.5%
32
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Valorant 75−80
+31.6%
57
−31.6%
World of Tanks 128
−49.2%
191
+49.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+25%
45−50
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+37%
27
−37%
Dota 2 65−70
−56.1%
103
+56.1%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−42.9%
90
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+8.3%
72
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+20.8%
100−110
−20.8%
Valorant 75−80
+27.1%
55−60
−27.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−5.4%
175
+5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
World of Tanks 120−130
−7%
137
+7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+87.5%
8
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+33.3%
35−40
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−11.9%
47
+11.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Valorant 45−50
+29.7%
35−40
−29.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Dota 2 30−35
+60%
20
−60%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+60%
20
−60%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−28.6%
72
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+60%
20
−60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3
−100%
Dota 2 30−35
−65.6%
53
+65.6%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Fortnite 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Valorant 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

4K
High Preset

World of Tanks 76
+0%
76
+0%

This is how HD 8970M Crossfire and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

  • HD 8970M Crossfire is 16% faster in 1080p
  • HD 8970M Crossfire is 27% faster in 1440p
  • HD 8970M Crossfire is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8970M Crossfire is 219% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5500M is 66% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8970M Crossfire is ahead in 45 tests (70%)
  • RX 5500M is ahead in 18 tests (28%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.18 14.27
Recency 1 May 2012 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 85 Watt

HD 8970M Crossfire has a 27.4% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 135.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5500M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 353 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.