GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon HD 8770M

Place in the ranking	774	207
Place by popularity	not in top-100	88
Power efficiency	no data	24.43
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Mars	GA106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2560
Core clock speed	775 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	825 MHz	1035 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	19.80	82.80
Floating-point processing power	0.6336 TFLOPS	5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	24	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8770M 2.99

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.29
+779%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8770M 1934

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
+834%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	54 −37%	74 +37%
1440p	5−6 −780%	44 +780%
4K	3−4 −800%	27 +800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−933%

62
+933%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −5900%	60 +5900%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −1540%	80−85 +1540%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −629%	50−55 +629%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −883%	59 +883%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −867%	55−60 +867%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −813%	140−150 +813%
Hitman 3	8−9 −900%	80 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −423%	110−120 +423%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −4667%	143 +4667%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1300%	98 +1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −608%	85−90 +608%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −492%	231 +492%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −3400%	35 +3400%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −1540%	80−85 +1540%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −629%	50−55 +629%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −650%	45 +650%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −867%	55−60 +867%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −813%	140−150 +813%
Hitman 3	8−9 −863%	77 +863%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −423%	110−120 +423%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −3700%	114 +3700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1014%	78 +1014%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −775%	105 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −286%	50−55 +286%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −421%	203 +421%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2500%	26 +2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −629%	50−55 +629%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −567%	40 +567%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −867%	55−60 +867%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −813%	140−150 +813%
Hitman 3	8−9 −738%	67 +738%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −318%	92 +318%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −650%	90 +650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −257%	50 +257%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +39.3%	28 −39.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−1057%

81
+1057%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −850%	35−40 +850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −767%	24−27 +767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2100%	22 +2100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −867%	27−30 +867%
Hitman 3	8−9 −475%	46 +475%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −763%	69 +763%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1450%	30−35 +1450%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −672%	139 +672%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−833%

56
+833%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	30−35
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −900%	10 +900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−625%

29
+625%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 +0%	26 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	60 +0%	60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	61 +0%	61 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	20 +0%	20 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	47 +0%	47 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29 +0%	29 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	34 +0%	34 +0%

This is how HD 8770M and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 37% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 780% faster in 1440p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8770M is 39% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 5900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 8770M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 60 tests (85%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.99	26.29
Recency	1 April 2013	11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has a 779.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8770M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.