T550 Mobile vs Radeon HD 8750M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8750M with T550 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 8750M
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.60

T550 Mobile outperforms HD 8750M by a whopping 382% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking812391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data39.31
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMarsTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date26 February 2013 (11 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed670 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors950 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rate16.08106.6
Floating-point processing power0.5146 TFLOPS3.41 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8750M 2.60
T550 Mobile 12.53
+382%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8750M 1004
T550 Mobile 4834
+381%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8750M 6840
T550 Mobile 25155
+268%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8750M 1698
T550 Mobile 8067
+375%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8750M 1277
T550 Mobile 4890
+283%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8750M 8525
T550 Mobile 33219
+290%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−378%
110−120
+378%
Full HD20
−165%
53
+165%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 14−16
Battlefield 5 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−431%
65−70
+431%
Hitman 3 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−180%
55−60
+180%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−209%
30−35
+209%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−68.4%
60−65
+68.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 14−16
Battlefield 5 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−431%
65−70
+431%
Hitman 3 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−180%
55−60
+180%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−282%
42
+282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−68.4%
60−65
+68.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 14−16
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−431%
65−70
+431%
Hitman 3 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−180%
55−60
+180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−227%
36
+227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−53.8%
20
+53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−68.4%
60−65
+68.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Hitman 3 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how HD 8750M and T550 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T550 Mobile is 378% faster in 900p
  • T550 Mobile is 165% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T550 Mobile is 1550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T550 Mobile is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 12.53
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

T550 Mobile has a 381.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The T550 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8750M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8750M is a notebook graphics card while T550 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Radeon HD 8750M
NVIDIA T550 Mobile
T550 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 204 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate T550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.