Arc A530M vs Radeon HD 8750M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8750M and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8750M
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.27

Arc A530M outperforms HD 8750M by a whopping 619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking831309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.88
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameMarsDG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 February 2013 (12 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841536
Core clock speed670 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors950 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate16.08124.8
Floating-point processing power0.5146 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2496
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8750M 2.27
Arc A530M 16.31
+619%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8750M 1016
Arc A530M 7287
+617%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−596%
160−170
+596%
Full HD20
−600%
140−150
+600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1940%
100−110
+1940%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1940%
100−110
+1940%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Fortnite 12−14
−700%
95−100
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−508%
70−75
+508%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
Valorant 40−45
−216%
130−140
+216%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1940%
100−110
+1940%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 54
−309%
220−230
+309%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Dota 2 24−27
−580%
170−180
+580%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Fortnite 12−14
−700%
95−100
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−508%
70−75
+508%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1017%
65−70
+1017%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Valorant 40−45
−216%
130−140
+216%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Dota 2 24−27
−580%
170−180
+580%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−508%
70−75
+508%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Valorant 40−45
−216%
130−140
+216%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−700%
95−100
+700%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−617%
120−130
+617%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−650%
160−170
+650%
Valorant 21−24
−682%
170−180
+682%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−633%
40−45
+633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Valorant 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Dota 2 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how HD 8750M and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is 596% faster in 900p
  • Arc A530M is 600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A530M is 3000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is ahead in 53 tests (88%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.27 16.31
Recency 26 February 2013 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

Arc A530M has a 618.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8750M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Radeon HD 8750M
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 213 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 206 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750M or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.