Radeon R7 M270DX vs HD 8670D

Place in the ranking	1010	831
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.96	no data
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	Devastator	Topaz
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	12 March 2013 (11 years ago)	11 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	844 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	940 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	22.80	22.56
Floating-point processing power	0.7296 TFLOPS	0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	IGP
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8670D 1.38

R7 M270DX 2.49
+80.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8670D 533

R7 M270DX 961
+80.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−76.5%

30−35
+76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−75%

7−8
+75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−50%

3−4
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hitman 3	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%