Radeon Instinct MI100 vs HD 8670D

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1012not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)CDNA 1.0 (2020)
GPU code nameDevastatorArcturus
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2013 (11 years ago)16 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847680
Core clock speed844 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1502 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million50,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate22.80721.0
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS23.07 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,229 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 16 November 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

HD 8670D has 200% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and Radeon Instinct MI100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Radeon HD 8670D
AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
Radeon Instinct MI100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 62 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 53 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.