GeForce 9100M G vs Radeon HD 8650M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	874	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN (2012−2015)	no data
GPU code name	no data	MCP77MH MCP79MH
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2013 (11 years ago)	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	8
Core clock speed	650 MHz	450 MHz
Number of transistors	900 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

medium sized

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	no data
Shared memory	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

11.1

10

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	7 January 2013	3 June 2008
Chip lithography	28 nm	65 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---