UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon HD 8650D IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated903
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.73
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameScrapperCoffee Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 December 2013 (10 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed720 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed844 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate20.2610.80
Floating-point processing power0.6482 TFLOPS0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 December 2013 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 610 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650D IGP and UHD Graphics 610. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
Radeon HD 8650D IGP
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 630 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.