AeroBox GPU vs Radeon HD 8570D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1089not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.19no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteKryptos
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 July 2013 (11 years ago)13 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256896
Core clock speed800 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speed868 MHz985 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate13.8955.16
Floating-point processing power0.4444 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1066 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.22 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2013 13 March 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

HD 8570D has 53.8% lower power consumption.

AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8570D and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8570D is a desktop card while AeroBox GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Radeon HD 8570D
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 100 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8570D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8570D or AeroBox GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.