GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics with GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
2013
2.37

RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics by a whopping 1091% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking819179
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.91
Power efficiencyno data17.22
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataGA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 August 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402560
Core clock speed720 / 825 MHz1552 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1777 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data142.2
Floating-point processing powerno data9.098 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Atomic Heart 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Fortnite 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Valorant 40−45
−1036%
500−550
+1036%
Atomic Heart 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−1022%
550−600
+1022%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Dota 2 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Fortnite 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Valorant 40−45
−1036%
500−550
+1036%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Dota 2 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Valorant 40−45
−1036%
500−550
+1036%
Fortnite 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1058%
220−230
+1058%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
Valorant 21−24
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Fortnite 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
Valorant 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.37 28.22
Recency 1 August 2013 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 8 GB has a 1090.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9
28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G HD 8750M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9
14052 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics or GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.