Radeon R5 430 OEM vs HD 8470D

Place in the ranking	1118	811
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.03	3.69
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Scrapper	Oland
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 July 2013 (11 years ago)	30 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	384
Core clock speed	800 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	850 MHz	780 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.20	18.72
Floating-point processing power	0.3264 TFLOPS	0.599 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	12	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	36.8 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8470D 0.97

R5 430 OEM 2.68
+176%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8470D 373

R5 430 OEM 1031
+176%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−173%

30−35
+173%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Fortnite	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
World of Tanks	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
World of Tanks	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Valorant	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

This is how HD 8470D and R5 430 OEM compete in popular games:

R5 430 OEM is 173% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.97	2.68
Recency	29 July 2013	30 June 2016
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt

R5 430 OEM has a 176.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R5 430 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8470D in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.