Radeon HD 6380G vs HD 8330

Place in the ranking	1180	1232
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	3.16	1.02
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Kalindi	SuperSumo
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	13 August 2013 (11 years ago)	14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	160
Core clock speed	497 MHz	400 MHz
Number of transistors	1,178 million	1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.976	3.200
Floating-point processing power	0.1272 TFLOPS	0.128 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	8	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	IGP
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8330 0.69
+32.7%

HD 6380G 0.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8330 265
+32.5%

HD 6380G 200

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

10
+42.9%

7−8

−42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

57.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Fortnite	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
World of Tanks	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
World of Tanks	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how HD 8330 and HD 6380G compete in popular games:

HD 8330 is 43% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8330 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 8330 is ahead in 11 tests (33%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (67%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.69	0.52
Recency	13 August 2013	14 June 2011
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt

HD 8330 has a 32.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 8330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6380G is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.