Radeon 660M vs HD 8250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8250 and Radeon 660M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8250
2013
8 Watt
0.55

660M outperforms HD 8250 by a whopping 2862% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1210326
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.7628.20
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKalindiRembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128384
Core clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20045.60
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs824
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8250 0.55
Radeon 660M 16.29
+2862%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8250 212
Radeon 660M 6285
+2865%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8250 423
Radeon 660M 6743
+1496%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8250 1317
Radeon 660M 23222
+1663%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8250 254
Radeon 660M 4848
+1812%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8250 1965
Radeon 660M 31515
+1504%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−567%
20
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−320%
21
+320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−391%
50−55
+391%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−107%
60−65
+107%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−320%
21
+320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−391%
50−55
+391%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−450%
33
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−107%
60−65
+107%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−100%
22
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−350%
27
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−50%
15
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−107%
60−65
+107%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+0%
19
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 660M is 6100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 660M is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 16.29
Recency 23 May 2013 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 40 Watt

HD 8250 has 400% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has a 2861.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8250
Radeon HD 8250
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 303 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.