GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire with GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

HD 7970M Crossfire
2012
200 Watt
13.79

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms HD 7970M Crossfire by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking35245
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.06
Power efficiency5.4725.21
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameWimbledon XTAD106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604352
Core clock speed850 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2535 MHz
Number of transistorsno data22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data344.8
Floating-point processing powerno data22.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p132
−241%
450−500
+241%
Full HD102
−243%
350−400
+243%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−253%
300−310
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−259%
230−240
+259%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−253%
300−310
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−253%
180−190
+253%
Fortnite 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−265%
230−240
+265%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−254%
170−180
+254%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
Valorant 120−130
−228%
400−450
+228%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−259%
230−240
+259%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−253%
300−310
+253%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−252%
700−750
+252%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Dota 2 90−95
−219%
300−310
+219%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−253%
180−190
+253%
Fortnite 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−265%
230−240
+265%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−254%
170−180
+254%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−268%
210−220
+268%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
Valorant 120−130
−228%
400−450
+228%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−259%
230−240
+259%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Dota 2 90−95
−219%
300−310
+219%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−253%
180−190
+253%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−265%
230−240
+265%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−264%
200−210
+264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
Valorant 120−130
−228%
400−450
+228%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−260%
400−450
+260%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−245%
500−550
+245%
Valorant 150−160
−259%
550−600
+259%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−257%
150−160
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Valorant 80−85
−261%
300−310
+261%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Dota 2 50−55
−258%
190−200
+258%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%

This is how HD 7970M Crossfire and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 241% faster in 900p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 243% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.79 50.82
Recency 1 May 2012 18 May 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 160 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti has a 268.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 10217 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.