GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7790

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking513not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.96no data
Power efficiency6.53no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBonaireG96C
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 March 2013 (11 years ago)19 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89632
Core clock speed1000 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate56.008.800
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPS0.0896 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length183 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2013 19 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 50 Watt

HD 7790 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

9500 GT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7790 and GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7790
Radeon HD 7790
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 215 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7790 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.