GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon HD 7770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7770M with GeForce RTX 4090 D, including specs and performance data.

HD 7770M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 32 Watt
3.42

RTX 4090 D outperforms HD 7770M by a whopping 2581% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.27
Power efficiency7.3314.79
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameChelseaAD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51214592
Core clock speed675 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt425 Watt
Texture fill rate21.601,149
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs32456
Tensor Coresno data456
Ray Tracing Coresno data114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−2400%
500−550
+2400%
Hitman 3 9−10
−2567%
240−250
+2567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−2500%
650−700
+2500%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−2567%
240−250
+2567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−2461%
1050−1100
+2461%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−2400%
500−550
+2400%
Hitman 3 9−10
−2567%
240−250
+2567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−2500%
650−700
+2500%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−2567%
240−250
+2567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−2567%
400−450
+2567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−2461%
1050−1100
+2461%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−2400%
500−550
+2400%
Hitman 3 9−10
−2567%
240−250
+2567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−2500%
650−700
+2500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−2567%
400−450
+2567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−2461%
1050−1100
+2461%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−2567%
240−250
+2567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2500%
130−140
+2500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2525%
210−220
+2525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−2519%
550−600
+2519%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−2471%
180−190
+2471%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.42 91.70
Recency 24 April 2012 28 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 425 Watt

HD 7770M has 1228.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has a 2581.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770M
Radeon HD 7770M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 91 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.