UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon HD 7770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7770 with UHD Graphics P630, including specs and performance data.

HD 7770
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
5.64

UHD Graphics P630 outperforms HD 7770 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking602575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.45no data
Power efficiency4.8329.24
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCape VerdeCoffee Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 February 2012 (12 years ago)24 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed1000 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate40.0028.80
Floating-point processing power1.28 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.64
UHD Graphics P630 6.40
+13.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2172
UHD Graphics P630 2465
+13.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Full HD46
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.46no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how HD 7770 and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics P630 is 6% faster in 900p
  • UHD Graphics P630 is 9% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7770 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7770 surpassed UHD Graphics P630 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.64 6.40
Recency 15 February 2012 24 May 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has a 13.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 939 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.