ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs HD 7770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6191542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.25no data
Power efficiency4.81no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameCape VerdeRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 February 2012 (13 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate40.000.96
Floating-point processing power1.28 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2171
+108450%
ATI 9200 PRO 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47no data
Full HD47no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.38no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 128 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Fortnite 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 February 2012 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 28 Watt

HD 7770 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 185.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7770 and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 965 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7770 or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.