GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 7770

Place in the ranking	595	961
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.33	no data
Power efficiency	4.87	2.16
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	GK107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	15 February 2012 (12 years ago)	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	384
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	950 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.00	30.40
Floating-point processing power	1.28 TFLOPS	0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	210 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	47 +292%	12−14 −292%
Full HD	45 +275%	12−14 −275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.53

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+350%

2−3

−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Hitman 3	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +300%	12−14 −300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Hitman 3	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +300%	12−14 −300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Hitman 3	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +300%	12−14 −300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+275%

4−5
−275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Hitman 3	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+400%

2−3
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1