GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7690M and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7690M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 20 Watt
2.36

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms HD 7690M by a whopping 1478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking842126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.1722.41
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameThamesGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 December 2011 (12 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4805120
Core clock speed725 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed725 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors716 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate17.40249.6
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS15.97 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs24160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7690M 2.36
RTX 3070 Mobile 37.23
+1478%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7690M 909
RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+1480%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7690M 1141
RTX 3070 Mobile 33996
+2879%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7690M 5884
RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+1211%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p25
−1300%
350−400
+1300%
Full HD19
−505%
115
+505%
1440p4−5
−1700%
72
+1700%
4K3−4
−1500%
48
+1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2280%
119
+2280%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1167%
75−80
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2040%
107
+2040%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1925%
80−85
+1925%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1450%
90−95
+1450%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1591%
180−190
+1591%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1529%
114
+1529%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−726%
150−160
+726%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−12000%
120−130
+12000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1127%
130−140
+1127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−241%
120−130
+241%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−2250%
188
+2250%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1167%
75−80
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1660%
88
+1660%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1925%
80−85
+1925%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1450%
90−95
+1450%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1591%
180−190
+1591%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1414%
106
+1414%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−726%
150−160
+726%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−14200%
143
+14200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1520%
81
+1520%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1564%
183
+1564%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−492%
75−80
+492%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−389%
181
+389%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1167%
75−80
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1380%
74
+1380%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1925%
80−85
+1925%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1418%
167
+1418%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1300%
98
+1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−595%
132
+595%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1427%
168
+1427%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−623%
94
+623%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−62.2%
60
+62.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1540%
82
+1540%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1675%
70−75
+1675%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1333%
40−45
+1333%
Hitman 3 7−8
−871%
68
+871%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−1767%
112
+1767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−1036%
159
+1036%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1360%
73
+1360%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 35−40
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 27

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1367%
44
+1367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+0%
91
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
+0%
68
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 125
+0%
125
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 38
+0%
38
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 119
+0%
119
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+0%
93
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 71
+0%
71
+0%

This is how HD 7690M and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 1300% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 505% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 1700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 1500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 14200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is ahead in 56 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.36 37.23
Recency 25 December 2011 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 125 Watt

HD 7690M has 525% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1477.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7690M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7690M
Radeon HD 7690M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7690M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1863 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.