Radeon RX 6650 XT vs HD 7690M XT

Place in the ranking	818	80
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	62.60
Power efficiency	7.18	17.40
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Thames	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2013 (11 years ago)	10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	2048
Core clock speed	725 MHz	2055 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2635 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	176 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.40	337.3
Floating-point processing power	0.696 TFLOPS	10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	24	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	280.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7690M XT 2.62

RX 6650 XT 44.67
+1605%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7690M XT 1009

RX 6650 XT 17213
+1606%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7690M XT 1346

RX 6650 XT 41739
+3001%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7690M XT 7055

RX 6650 XT 105955
+1402%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	22 −1491%	350−400 +1491%
Full HD	23 −500%	138 +500%
1440p	3−4 −2033%	64 +2033%
4K	2−3 −1650%	35 +1650%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.89
1440p	no data	6.23
4K	no data	11.40

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−2460%

128
+2460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1075%	90−95 +1075%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	75−80
Battlefield 5	4−5 −3475%	140−150 +3475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1383%	85−90 +1383%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −2060%	108 +2060%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1780%	90−95 +1780%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1457%	100−110 +1457%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1462%	200−210 +1462%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1271%	95−100 +1271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −762%	180−190 +762%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −6750%	130−140 +6750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −1427%	160−170 +1427%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −258%	130−140 +258%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1075%	90−95 +1075%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	75−80
Battlefield 5	4−5 −3475%	140−150 +3475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1383%	85−90 +1383%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1660%	88 +1660%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1780%	90−95 +1780%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1457%	100−110 +1457%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1462%	200−210 +1462%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1271%	95−100 +1271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −762%	180−190 +762%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −6750%	130−140 +6750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −1918%	222 +1918%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −608%	90−95 +608%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −258%	130−140 +258%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1075%	90−95 +1075%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	75−80
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1383%	85−90 +1383%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1460%	78 +1460%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1780%	90−95 +1780%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1462%	200−210 +1462%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1271%	95−100 +1271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −724%	173 +724%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −1655%	193 +1655%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −723%	107 +723%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −71.1%	65 +71.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−1567%

100−105
+1567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2100%	85−90 +2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −1625%	65−70 +1625%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4300%	44 +4300%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1633%	50−55 +1633%
Hitman 3	8−9 −650%	60−65 +650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1743%	129 +1743%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −3300%	65−70 +3300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −1273%	200−210 +1273%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−1183%

75−80
+1183%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −4500%	45−50 +4500%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −3800%	35−40 +3800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1500%	30−35 +1500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2800%	27−30 +2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	23

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−925%

40−45
+925%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	114 +0%	114 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	124 +0%	124 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56 +0%	56 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	64 +0%	64 +0%

This is how HD 7690M XT and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6650 XT is 1491% faster in 900p
RX 6650 XT is 500% faster in 1080p
RX 6650 XT is 2033% faster in 1440p
RX 6650 XT is 1650% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 6750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6650 XT is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.62	44.67
Recency	7 January 2013	10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	176 Watt

HD 7690M XT has 604% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 1605% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7690M XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7690M XT is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.