Radeon RX Vega M vs HD 7690M Rebrand

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data79.32
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameWhistlerVega
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480512
Core clock speed600 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors716 million4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4038.08
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7690M Rebrand and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7690M Rebrand is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7690M Rebrand
Radeon HD 7690M Rebrand
AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 7690M Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.